[IntelMQ-dev] IEP009

[Thomas Hungenberg]

Hi Kamil,

 > The first variant is with the idea that although CPE should be used,
 > the IEP is open also for products not included in the CPE dictionary.

Yes, for this reason I think variant 1

 > `product.name` -> `product.full_name` (human-readable name)
 > `product.product` -> `product.name` (product name as in CPE)

is the better solution.

     - Thomas


On 06.02.24 12:50, Kamil Mankowski via IntelMQ-dev wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> Nice to hear you like it! What would you say about those two variants:
> 
> 1) Rename two fields, like:
> 
> `product.name` -> `product.full_name` (human-readable name)
> `product.product` -> `product.name` (product name as in CPE)
> 
> 2) Rename just one:
> 
> `product.product` -> `product.cpe_name`
> 
> I think it would be easier to read.
> 
> The first variant is with the idea that although CPE should be used, the IEP is open also for products not included in the CPE dictionary.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> // Kamil Mańkowski <mankowski at cert.at> - T: +43 676 898 298 7204
> // CERT Austria - https://www.cert.at/
> // CERT.at GmbH, FB-Nr. 561772k, HG Wien
> 
> On 2/6/24 11:04, Thomas Hungenberg wrote:
>> Hi Kamil,
>>
>> I like your proposal very much!
>>
>> However, "product.product" sounds a bit confusing.
>> Maybe this can be changed to "product.cpename" or something like that?
>>
>>
>>       - Thomas