On 07 Oct 2016, at 10:53, Dustin Demuth dustin.demuth@intevation.de wrote:
Hi,
thanks for ordering these Issues.
So I understand: A higher the number in square-brackets, indicates a higher priority.
Yes. 13 is as valuable as the sum of 8 and 5 .. that's the idea. As said - it is just an initial gut feeling prioritation by me. Feel free to change/adapt.
BR Dustin
Am Mittwoch 05 Oktober 2016 19:03:02 schrieb L. Aaron Kaplan:
Hi,
Sebastian and me recently had a meeting at CERT.at - discussing the minimal feature set that we still want to have (from our perspective) for putting a "1.0" label on it.
We came up with a list. I am now prioritising this list.
I took a trick which I learned from another software project and assign priorities to the issues I create in github in the form of Fibonacci sequence numbers: 1,2,3,5,8,13. The benefit of this is that an intuitive value of 13 is really as valuable/high prio as the sum of the previous two priorities. It's rather a bit geeky, but it seems to work.
Example: https://github.com/certtools/intelmq/issues/722
Anyway. Just letting you know (so that you don't wonder what this is). This is merely to be read as hint as what I see as high prio. Feel free to adapt the prios or discuss here.
Best, a.
-- dustin.demuth@intevation.de https://intevation.de/ OpenPGP key: B40D2EFF Intevation GmbH, Neuer Graben 17, 49074 Osnabrück; AG Osnabrück, HR B 18998 Geschäftsführer: Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner _______________________________________________ Intelmq-dev mailing list Intelmq-dev@lists.cert.at http://lists.cert.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/intelmq-dev