[Ach] Listing uncovered Software
list at sysfu.com
Mon Feb 23 17:37:56 CET 2015
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 07:51:15 -0800, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
<dkg at fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
> I'm not sure how we'd decide what gets listed in "these are hopeless" as
> opposed to just not listed at all, though. Should we list the
> "hopeless" items by protocol or by implementation? Should the threshold
> be some sort of userbase size? there are surely thousands of
> network-facing applications out there that might legitimately be called
> "hopeless". Is network-facing the right cutoff? gpg is arguably not a
> network-facing application, for example.
I would minimum userbase size (although this is always tough to nail down
in the FLOSS world) of say at least 1000 + network facing.
More information about the Ach