[Ach] work for the upcoming 1.0 release

[Tobias Pape]

On 22.03.2014, at 22:27, Aaron Zauner <azet at azet.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> Tobias Pape wrote:
>> Now or after 1.0?
>> 
> Now if possible. We need people actually committing that, I do not see
> any reason not to do it this way, it'll be more convenient. If we ship
> configurations in the paper that are actually linked .conf files, we
> should think about automatically generating cryptographic checksums for
> those files and include the sum under every mentioned configuration as
> well. So readers can confirm the authenticity of the paper as well as
> the configurations in the paper and online.
> 

ACK

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1625 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.cert.at/pipermail/ach/attachments/20140322/f2fa4862/attachment.sig>