[Ach] work for the upcoming 1.0 release

[Aaron Zauner]

Tobias Pape wrote:
> Now or after 1.0?
> 
Now if possible. We need people actually committing that, I do not see
any reason not to do it this way, it'll be more convenient. If we ship
configurations in the paper that are actually linked .conf files, we
should think about automatically generating cryptographic checksums for
those files and include the sum under every mentioned configuration as
well. So readers can confirm the authenticity of the paper as well as
the configurations in the paper and online.

Aaron

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.cert.at/pipermail/ach/attachments/20140322/855816da/attachment.sig>