[Ach] DNSSEC and reference/mention to it
david.durvaux at gmail.com
Mon Feb 3 12:43:27 CET 2014
Fully agree. DNSSEC should be added.
If I correctly remember, Aaron K. propose to ask NIC.at experts for advises
Otherwise, I can ask here at Belnet.
2014-02-03 Aaron Zauner <azet at azet.org>:
> Browsing through the pull request on GitHub for Kerberos (which is a
> very good addition to the paper, just waiting for proper refereces to
> url-items and BibTeX - Then I'm merging this!): I've noticed missing
> reference to DNSSEC.
> What's your opinion on DNSSEC and DANE? I think we're running into the
> same issue as with X.509 hierarchical trust structure (a few people,
> most of them based in the US of A holding root keys). This is an issue
> IMHO. Please discuss if we should even think about adding DNSSEC/DANE to
> our paper or write a section suggesting looking into further development
> of distributed trust infrastructure..
> Ach mailing list
> Ach at lists.cert.at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ach