[Ach] DNSSEC and reference/mention to it

David Durvaux david.durvaux at gmail.com
Mon Feb 3 12:43:27 CET 2014


Fully agree.  DNSSEC should be added.

If I correctly remember, Aaron K. propose to ask NIC.at experts for advises
on this.
Otherwise, I can ask here at Belnet.



2014-02-03 Aaron Zauner <azet at azet.org>:

> Hi,
> Browsing through the pull request on GitHub for Kerberos (which is a
> very good addition to the paper, just waiting for proper refereces to
> url-items and BibTeX - Then I'm merging this!): I've noticed missing
> reference to DNSSEC.
> What's your opinion on DNSSEC and DANE? I think we're running into the
> same issue as with X.509 hierarchical trust structure (a few people,
> most of them based in the US of A holding root keys). This is an issue
> IMHO. Please discuss if we should even think about adding DNSSEC/DANE to
> our paper or write a section suggesting looking into further development
> of distributed trust infrastructure..
> Thanks,
> Aaron
> _______________________________________________
> Ach mailing list
> Ach at lists.cert.at
> http://lists.cert.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ach

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cert.at/pipermail/ach/attachments/20140203/2b6ee387/attachment.html>

More information about the Ach mailing list