[Ach] justifing config. settings in the paper

[L. Aaron Kaplan]

On Nov 15, 2013, at 5:14 PM, Adi Kriegisch <adi at kriegisch.at> wrote:

> Hi!
> 
>>> I have to disagree. We should not include lenghty justifications but short and definitive sentences what those settings actually mean and what they break.
>> ACK . And add a reference to some source explaining this more in detail.
> Ok, and did by any chance someone read the justification for config B? --
> Ist that the way you want it?
> 

I did and made some minor corrections. 
Yes. I think it is a really good start. 
Thanks :) We are getting somewhere IMHO. It's just a longer process than initially imagined :)

a.


--- 
// L. Aaron Kaplan <kaplan at cert.at> - T: +43 1 5056416 78
// CERT Austria - http://www.cert.at/
// Eine Initiative der nic.at GmbH - http://www.nic.at/
// Firmenbuchnummer 172568b, LG Salzburg




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.cert.at/pipermail/ach/attachments/20131115/0ef70f07/attachment.sig>