[Ach] justifing config. settings in the paper

L. Aaron Kaplan kaplan at cert.at
Fri Nov 15 17:00:32 CET 2013

On Nov 15, 2013, at 4:54 PM, Aaron Zauner <azet at azet.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> I have to disagree. We should not include lenghty justifications but short and definitive sentences what those settings actually mean and what they break.
ACK . And add a reference to some source explaining this more in detail.

> We use a lot of configuration options that will seem alien to normal system administrators since they never bothered to use them. We should document this properly.
> (Sorry for all my typos yesterday, was on a very long flight and did barely sleep the night before)

Welcome back to the living :)


// L. Aaron Kaplan <kaplan at cert.at> - T: +43 1 5056416 78
// CERT Austria - http://www.cert.at/
// Eine Initiative der nic.at GmbH - http://www.nic.at/
// Firmenbuchnummer 172568b, LG Salzburg

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.cert.at/pipermail/ach/attachments/20131115/bb76a50e/attachment.sig>

More information about the Ach mailing list