[Intelmq-dev] Does anyone use the ftp(s) collector?

[Dustin Demuth]

Hi,

thanks for asking this on the list.
We are not using these collectors.


To clarify:
The licensing Issue does currently only concern the FTPS collector.

In my opinion the FTP and the FTPS collectors should be merged into one 
collector.

My suggestion is:

1) keep support for FTP,
2) drop support for FTPS, if possible. 
3) Create a new task to enable FTPS in the existing FTP collector.


On which date do we want to make a decision about the future of FTPS in 
IntelMQ?


BR
Dustin

Am Montag 30 Januar 2017 17:33:46 schrieb Sebastian Wagner:
> Hi,
>
> as there are license issues with the code of the FTP(S) collector[1], I
> raised the question if these collectors are actually used somewhere by
> someone? The bot is not mentioned at all in the Feeds.md.
>
> Are you using it? If no, do you think it should be kept nevertheless?
>
> Sebastian
>
>  [1]: https://github.com/certtools/intelmq/issues/842


-- 
dustin.demuth at intevation.de  https://intevation.de/   OpenPGP key: B40D2EFF
Intevation GmbH, Neuer Graben 17, 49074 Osnabrück; AG Osnabrück, HR B 18998
Geschäftsführer:   Frank Koormann,  Bernhard Reiter,  Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.cert.at/pipermail/intelmq-dev/attachments/20170131/9b629728/attachment.sig>