[Ach] EDH/ECDH, AES128/AES256 - was: Secure E-Mail Transport based on DNSSec/TLSA/DANE

[L. Aaron Kaplan]

> On 03 Nov 2015, at 07:57, Gunnar Haslinger <gh.bettercrypto at hitco.at> wrote:
> 
> Am 2015-11-03 00:38, schrieb Aaron Zauner:
>> Nevertheless I feel the same way, AES128 should be preferred;
>> and that exactly what we're doing with the latest version of
>> our bettercrypto cipherstring recommendation:
>> https://git.bettercrypto.org/ach-master.git/blob/HEAD:/src/common/cipherStringB.tex
> 
> 
> Oh - didn't notice that, because CipherString-B in Theory-Section 3.2.3 is different to Apache-Recommendation in Section 2.1.1.
> 
> Is there a reason why it is different or should the Apache-Recommendation be updated too?

This sounds like a mistake then. They should be the same.

> 
> 
> 
> regards,
> Gunnar
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ach mailing list
> Ach at lists.cert.at
> http://lists.cert.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ach

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.cert.at/pipermail/ach/attachments/20151103/898a7eb0/attachment.sig>