Hi Kamil,
Sorry for the late response. I just joined the mailing list. We think this would be a very nice feature to have. Since the current version does not have this option, we built our own complex routing. By making it possible to use a constituency field, it would make our routing less complex and more flexible.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Luitzen Homma
Digital Trust Center (DTC)
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: mankowski at cert.at (Kamil Mankowski) <mankowski at cert.at (Kamil Mankowski)> Verzonden: donderdag 2 november 2023 16:02 Onderwerp: [IntelMQ-users] Introducing proposals to IntelMQ Data Format (IEP008 and 9)
Dear IntelMQ Developers & Users,
I'd like to propose two changes to the IntelMQ data format to make it more suitable for current use cases.
1. IEP008 - add constituency identifier (this has already been shared, but only on the developer list): https://github.com/certtools/ieps/pull/9 2. IEP009 - add product and vulnerability information: https://github.com/certtools/ieps/pull/10
I'd like to hear your feedback on these suggestions. Feel free to comment here or on the Github pull requests. My plan is to implement them, unless rejected, by December.
-- Best regards, Kamil Mankowski CERT.at GmbH www.cert.at