[Ach] EDH/ECDH, AES128/AES256 - was: Secure E-Mail Transport based on DNSSec/TLSA/DANE
L. Aaron Kaplan
aaron at lo-res.org
Tue Nov 3 08:04:50 CET 2015
> On 03 Nov 2015, at 07:57, Gunnar Haslinger <gh.bettercrypto at hitco.at> wrote:
> Am 2015-11-03 00:38, schrieb Aaron Zauner:
>> Nevertheless I feel the same way, AES128 should be preferred;
>> and that exactly what we're doing with the latest version of
>> our bettercrypto cipherstring recommendation:
> Oh - didn't notice that, because CipherString-B in Theory-Section 3.2.3 is different to Apache-Recommendation in Section 2.1.1.
> Is there a reason why it is different or should the Apache-Recommendation be updated too?
This sounds like a mistake then. They should be the same.
> Ach mailing list
> Ach at lists.cert.at
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
More information about the Ach