[Ach] Logjam: Missing Debian Stable "Features"

georg at riseup.net georg at riseup.net
Thu May 21 12:48:44 CEST 2015

On 15-05-21 12:43:46, Hanno Böck wrote:
> On Thu, 21 May 2015 12:11:27 +0200
> Axel Hübl <axel.huebl at web.de> wrote:
> > Should we actually discourage using Debian stable? ;)
> [...]
> > I mean: not backporting such "new features" is actually a security
> > risk in that context.
> I think this is an underapprechiated problem and I think it's
> one that should be pushed forward. We have a problem here and nobody
> really has a good solution I think. There is a fundamental clash with
> the idea of long term support solutions and complex security fixes.

Is there something like a debate going on in Debian, between the DD/DM
or in other "big distro-circles" about this?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.cert.at/pipermail/ach/attachments/20150521/46f6122c/attachment.sig>

More information about the Ach mailing list