[Ach] Recommending Blowfish in the ACH paper

[Aaron Zauner]

On 05 Nov 2013, at 16:25, Pepi Zawodsky <pepi.zawodsky at maclemon.at> wrote:
> 
> The Blowfish bruteforcing tool ist just what the name suggests. A very dumb tool trying out passwords one at a time. This is not an attack on the crypto itself just guessing. 
Sure. Just included it because i wasn’t aware of it - i guess bruteforcing blowfish is of no real concern to us. :)

> This moves our discussion about recommended fish from Blowfish to Twofish.
Is twofish (or threefish) even supported in any ciphersuite? 

Aaron
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1091 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.cert.at/pipermail/ach/attachments/20131105/ba95e0c3/attachment.sig>