[Ach] IRC

[David Durvaux]

Hey,

Indeed, I made a typo.  It's fixed.

Kr,

David


2013/12/12 Aaron Zauner <azet at azet.org>

> Hey,
>
> Thanks! I think you’ve made an error, because `make pdf` reports a warning
> and also text after the IRC section is all the way italic :)
>
>
> http://i1296.photobucket.com/albums/ag15/chrisjophoto/bubbles_zpsb0e6e862.gif
>
> Aaron
>
> On 12 Dec 2013, at 18:56, David Durvaux <david.durvaux at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I made a quick first draft of the IRC section using the Charybdis which
> serve as basis to the IRCD-Seven made by Freenode.
> > I pick that one as
> > 1- Freenode is the biggest IRC network ;)
> > 2- It's part of the standard Ubuntu and Debian.
> >
> > I suspect that lazy admin will prefer something they can install with
> apt-get install to something then need to retrieve from GIT and then
> install ;-).
> >
> > I will continue the IRC section then move to a SILC one as proposed by
> Aaron.
> >
> > Kr,
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> > 2013/12/12 David Durvaux <david.durvaux at gmail.com>
> > OK.
> >
> > Let's go for SILC and the IRC server mentionned earlier.
> > We can extend later if needed (the document will change over time).
> >
> > Kr,
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> > 2013/12/12 Aaron Zauner <azet at azet.org>
> > We should maybe mention SILC as well (
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SILC_(protocol))
> >
> > Aaron
> >
> > On 12 Dec 2013, at 09:01, Arsen STASIC <arsen.stasic at univie.ac.at>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Its useless to write configs for that many different implementations so
> > > I would pick option 2 "we pick up a reference implementation" and
> choose
> > > the most used ircd: http://irc.netsplit.de/networks/top10.php
> > >
> > > just my 2 ct
> > > -arsen
> > >
> > > * David Durvaux <david.durvaux at gmail.com> [2013-12-12 08:47 (+0100)]:
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Still checking the documentation of IRC ;).
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I actually have 2 problems:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 1) the original IRC implementation (IRCD-IRC2) doesn't even support
> SSL...
> > >> It's completly "unsecure" regarding privacy, integrity...
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 2) there are a lot of IRC server implementation.  The features really
> vary
> > >> from one implementation to another one ;).
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> So, what do we do?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 1) we take a few implementation and show how to configure correctly;
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 2) we pick up a reference implementation;
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 3) we drop IRC :-D.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I would go for 2) (with an alternative choice).
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> So, does someone can recommend a "good" implementation?
> > >>
> > >>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Internet_Relay_Chat_daemons
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >>
> > >> Kr,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> David
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> David DURVAUX
> > >
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Ach mailing list
> > >> Ach at lists.cert.at
> > >> http://lists.cert.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ach
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Ach mailing list
> > > Ach at lists.cert.at
> > > http://lists.cert.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ach
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > David DURVAUX
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > David DURVAUX
>
>


-- 
David DURVAUX
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cert.at/pipermail/ach/attachments/20131212/8a41d232/attachment.html>